Re: spam and who you formerly were

Subject: Re: spam and who you formerly were
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:13:29 -0800

Since our email addresses can all be mined off various locations, including
the web portal of TECHWR-L, it wouldn't surprise me if there's spam being
sent with my email address spoofed into it that someone's mail reader is
reporting to the databases. That's why readers also have buttons to
manually add addresses to whitelists that override the spam databases.

Gene Kim-Eng


On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:57 PM, McLauchlan, Kevin <
Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com> wrote:

> As for most mail readers.... lately, I’ve had to rescue about twenty
> Techwrl posts per day (including a couple of yours) from the Postini
> summary that I get each evening. Don’t know what changed in the past week,
> whether it’s the corporate filter settings, or something about the list
> messages.
>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

http://bit.ly/doc-to-help

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
spam and who you formerly were: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
RE: spam and who you formerly were: From: Margaret Cekis
Re: spam and who you formerly were: From: Steve Schwarzman
RE: spam and who you formerly were: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
Re: spam and who you formerly were: From: Gene Kim-Eng
RE: spam and who you formerly were: From: McLauchlan, Kevin

Previous by Author: Re: spam and who you formerly were
Next by Author: Re: Dealing with samples...
Previous by Thread: RE: spam and who you formerly were
Next by Thread: Re: spam and who you formerly were


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads