RE: Tools statistics

Subject: RE: Tools statistics
From: "Rick Quatro" <rick -at- rickquatro -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:27:23 -0400

Hi Chris,

I agree. It looks like the GUI was "glued on" without any regard to the
underlying interface. For example, you still don't have a pasteboard so you
can see bleeds and there are no ruler guides. Plus, they broke long
established keyboard shortcuts for applying formats, etc.

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+rick=rickquatro -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+rick=rickquatro -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf
Of Chris Morton
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:54 PM
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: Tools statistics

I've been a Windows user since I was introduced to it by way of Aldus
PageMaker 1.0a in the late '80s. Windows was itself very much in its
infancy, but I stuck with it (and it subsequently paid off in spades, but
that's another story). I was brought into this tech writing world as a a bit
of a PM guru; I took my FM baptismal much later.

The point is that I've long been married to both Windows UI conventions and
to the flexible layout and typesetting capabilities afforded by "the Aldus
methodology" (or however John Warnock phrased it). That Framemaker ignores
both rubs me the wrong way, inasmuch as it's my belief that a Windows app
should at least make an *attempt* at adhering to known M$ GUI conventions
(right or wrong)-just like Apple rides herd over Mac-centric apps and their
compliance.

Much like other noted Adobe product deficiencies, I see this as nothing more
than that company's bean counters not wanting to devote resources to
retooling FM's UI. I get that it's a business decision, but I'm left
wanting... not that I'm in love with ID, either.

> Chris




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Re: Tools statistics: From: Peter Gold
Re: Tools statistics: From: Scott Turner
Re: Tools statistics: From: Robert Lauriston
Re: Tools statistics: From: Chris Morton

Previous by Author: RE: Tools statistics
Next by Author: RE: Creating mobile help
Previous by Thread: Re: Tools statistics
Next by Thread: Re: Tools statistics


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads