Re: So now we are content engineers?

Subject: Re: So now we are content engineers?
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:17:57 -0800

People who think their professional opinions are special enough that
other people should buy their books and so on invite criticism.

I've found pundits in fields such as politics and economics whose
insights are worth the time it takes me to read them and in some cases
even buy their books. I have yet to find anyone who writes about our
profession at a level beyond the virtual water-cooler chitchat we have
here.

On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:42 AM, <jackdeland -at- comcast -dot- net> wrote:
> Getting way tired of the attacks on Mark Baker here. ...


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Best places to put topics when they're needed twice: From: Editor in Chief
Re: Best places to put topics when they're needed twice: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: Best places to put topics when they're needed twice: From: rebecca officer
Re: Best places to put topics when they're needed twice: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: Best places to put topics when they're needed twice: From: Kathleen MacDowell
So now we are content engineers?: From: Erika Yanovich
RE: So now we are content engineers?: From: Dan Goldstein
Re: So now we are content engineers?: From: Lauren
Re: So now we are content engineers?: From: jackdeland

Previous by Author: Re: So now we are content engineers?
Next by Author: Re: Footnotes - acceptable in technical documentation?
Previous by Thread: Re: So now we are content engineers?
Next by Thread: RE: So now we are content engineers?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads