RE: ILF... but is it, really?

Subject: RE: ILF... but is it, really?
From: Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: Matthew Helmke <matthew -at- matthewhelmke -dot- com>, "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:16:33 -0500

FWIW, the original query came from
Editor in Chief (editorialstandards -at- gmail -dot- com)
who has been contributing fairly often (if rather anonymously) to this
list for quite some time.
I'm not sure why Matthew thinks this was spam that came from his email server
unless he is the person behind the "Editor in Chief" screen name...

-Fred Ridder

> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:03:33 -0600
> Subject: Re: Re: ILF... but is it, really?
> From: matthew -at- matthewhelmke -dot- com
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> For what it is worth, everyone, the original email was spoofed from my
> email server. There is no account on my server for anyone with any
> variation of "Editor" in the username nor do I know anything about ILF.
>
> This is spam that got through the filter. Sorry, all.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Nancy Allison <maker -at- verizon -dot- net> wrote:
>
> > Follow-up question. Just searched for "ILF" and got a definition that I
> > assume is not what you mean. What does ILF mean in your context?




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: Re: ILF... but is it, really?: From: Nancy Allison
Re: Re: ILF... but is it, really?: From: Matthew Helmke

Previous by Author: So now we are content engineers?
Next by Author: Re: Best places to put topics when they're needed twice
Previous by Thread: Re: Re: ILF... but is it, really?
Next by Thread: Re: ILF... but is it, really?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads