Re: ILF... but is it, really?

Subject: Re: ILF... but is it, really?
From: Matthew Helmke <matthew -at- matthewhelmke -dot- com>
To: Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:37:21 -0600

Maybe I'm confused. When I received it, the original email header said it
was from:
Editor in Chief (editorialstandards -at- gmail -dot- com) via matthewhelmke.com

This is atypical for email I receive, so I guess I made a bad assumption.

Sorry again for the confusion.


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com> wrote:

> FWIW, the original query came from
> Editor in Chief (editorialstandards -at- gmail -dot- com)
> who has been contributing fairly often (if rather anonymously) to this
> list for quite some time.
> I'm not sure why Matthew thinks this was spam that came from his email
> server
> unless he is the person behind the "Editor in Chief" screen name...
>
> -Fred Ridder
>
> > Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:03:33 -0600
> > Subject: Re: Re: ILF... but is it, really?
> > From: matthew -at- matthewhelmke -dot- com
> > To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> >
> > For what it is worth, everyone, the original email was spoofed from my
> > email server. There is no account on my server for anyone with any
> > variation of "Editor" in the username nor do I know anything about ILF.
> >
> > This is spam that got through the filter. Sorry, all.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Nancy Allison <maker -at- verizon -dot- net>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Follow-up question. Just searched for "ILF" and got a definition that I
> > > assume is not what you mean. What does ILF mean in your context?
>
>


--
Matthew Helmke
matthew -at- matthewhelmke -dot- com
Author of Ubuntu Unleashed, Humor and Moroccan Culture, and Nowhere Else to
Turn
Coauthor of VMware Cookbook and The Official Ubuntu Book


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: Re: ILF... but is it, really?: From: Nancy Allison
Re: Re: ILF... but is it, really?: From: Matthew Helmke
RE: ILF... but is it, really?: From: Fred Ridder

Previous by Author: Re: Re: ILF... but is it, really?
Next by Author: RE: So now we are content engineers?
Previous by Thread: RE: ILF... but is it, really?
Next by Thread: Re: ILF... but is it, really?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads