Re: ILF... but is it, really?

Subject: Re: ILF... but is it, really?
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: Matthew Helmke <matthew -at- matthewhelmke -dot- com>, "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 09:18:28 -0800

"via" is a GMail thing. On mail from this list, I get "via lauriston.com".

https://support.google.com/mail/answer/1311182?hl=en&ctx=mail

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Matthew Helmke
<matthew -at- matthewhelmke -dot- com> wrote:
> Maybe I'm confused. When I received it, the original email header said it
> was from:
> Editor in Chief (editorialstandards -at- gmail -dot- com) via matthewhelmke.com
>
> This is atypical for email I receive, so I guess I made a bad assumption.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Re: Re: ILF... but is it, really?: From: Nancy Allison
Re: Re: ILF... but is it, really?: From: Matthew Helmke
RE: ILF... but is it, really?: From: Fred Ridder
Re: ILF... but is it, really?: From: Matthew Helmke

Previous by Author: Re: What search technologies are you using for web-based documentation (both local and on the Web)?
Next by Author: Re: Printing a booklet
Previous by Thread: Re: ILF... but is it, really?
Next by Thread: Re: Re: ILF... but is it, really?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads