RE: Abbreviations for Languages?

Subject: RE: Abbreviations for Languages?
From: Dan Goldstein <DGoldstein -at- cytomedix -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L (techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com)" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:14:57 -0500

Both pages that were cited here (ISO 639 and RFC 3066) use "en_GB" for "United Kingdom," as if Great Britain and the United Kingdom were the same thing - which of course they aren't.

-----Original Message-----
From: Monique Semp
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 4:56 PM
To: Guy K. Haas; Nancy Allison
Cc: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: Abbreviations for Languages?

> Here's one:

ISO-639 are the two-letter codes, but to combine the language and the region, you want ISO-3166, which gives you en_US and en_GB for US English and Great Britain English.

New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more:


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Abbreviations for Languages?: From: Nancy Allison
Re: Abbreviations for Languages?: From: Guy K. Haas
Re: Abbreviations for Languages?: From: Monique Semp

Previous by Author: RE: [TechWhirl Forums] Authors who cannot write
Next by Author: RE: need a word for "ranging"
Previous by Thread: Re: Abbreviations for Languages?
Next by Thread: RE: Abbreviations for Languages?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads