RE: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?

Subject: RE: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?
From: Elayne Sandahl <esandahl -at- cdnpay -dot- ca>
To: "salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com" <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com>, Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:16:34 -0400

Two things about this thread make me smile:

1. Tech writers edit EVERYONE's content. I started to read a book called "Traffic - Why We Drive the Way We Do", and found myself editing it more than reading it. Especially when he listed eight things about traffic - Numbers 1, 3, 4, 8 and 7. Hmmmm... I gave up and gave the book to charity - full of redlining!
2. Chris Morton's sense of humour is too subtle - as noted by his e-mail address.

Cheers,
Elayne




Elayne Sandahl
Technical Documentation Specialist / Sp?cialiste de documentation technique
1601 Telesat Court, Suite C3, Ottawa, Ontario, K1B 5P4
Phone. (613)907-1300 x 4284
Fax / T?l?c. (613) 907-1335
Canadian Payments Association | Association canadienne des paiements
http://www.cdnpay.ca
http://www.twitter.com/cdnpay

To stop receiving ALL CPA email, contact us at unsubscribe -at- cdnpay -dot- ca
Pour cesser de recevoir TOUT courriel en provenance de l'ACP, veuillez communiquer avec nous ? l'adresse unsubscribe -at- cdnpay -dot- ca

-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+esandahl=cdnpay -dot- ca -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+esandahl=cdnpay -dot- ca -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of Chris Morton
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 12:30 PM
To: Peter Neilson
Cc: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?

After further review of the Social Media Sonar site, I have nothing but disdain for its author. Whatever value his books may provide is quickly offset by his inability to use correct grammar and spelling. His is a clear example of self-publishing gone awry.

> Chris


On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:

> Good point... thanks for the elucidation. ;<)
>
> > Chris
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Peter Neilson
> <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:40:56 -0400, Chris Morton
>> <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> used "ego's" as the plural form of ego.
>>>
>>
>> What? All plural's have apostrophe's! The apostrophe warn's you that
>> an "s" is about to appear.
>>
>
>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help | http://bit.ly/1lRPd2l

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as esandahl -at- cdnpay -dot- ca -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help | http://bit.ly/1lRPd2l

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Monique Semp
RE: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Peter Hirons
RE: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Cardimon, Craig
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Chris Morton
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Mark Giffin
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Chris Morton
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Mark Giffin
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Chris Morton
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Mark Giffin
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Julie Stickler
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Chris Morton
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Peter Neilson
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Chris Morton
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Chris Morton

Previous by Author: RE: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?
Next by Author: user expecttations - web-based help
Previous by Thread: Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?
Next by Thread: Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads