Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?

Subject: Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?
From: Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: Elayne Sandahl <esandahl -at- cdnpay -dot- ca>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:18:44 -0700

Thanks, Elayne... Adam Sandler or Chevy Chase I'm definitely not. > Chris


On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Elayne Sandahl <esandahl -at- cdnpay -dot- ca> wrote:

> Two things about this thread make me smile:
>
> 1. Tech writers edit EVERYONE's content. I started to read a book
> called "Traffic - Why We Drive the Way We Do", and found myself editing it
> more than reading it. Especially when he listed eight things about traffic
> - Numbers 1, 3, 4, 8 and 7. Hmmmm... I gave up and gave the book to
> charity - full of redlining!
> 2. Chris Morton's sense of humour is too subtle - as noted by his
> e-mail address.
>
> Cheers,
> Elayne
>
>
>
>
> Elayne Sandahl
> Technical Documentation Specialist / Sp?cialiste de documentation technique
> 1601 Telesat Court, Suite C3, Ottawa, Ontario, K1B 5P4
> Phone. (613)907-1300 x 4284
> Fax / T?l?c. (613) 907-1335
> Canadian Payments Association | Association canadienne des paiements
> http://www.cdnpay.ca
> http://www.twitter.com/cdnpay
>
> To stop receiving ALL CPA email, contact us at unsubscribe -at- cdnpay -dot- ca
> Pour cesser de recevoir TOUT courriel en provenance de l'ACP, veuillez
> communiquer avec nous ? l'adresse unsubscribe -at- cdnpay -dot- ca
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+esandahl=cdnpay -dot- ca -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:
> techwr-l-bounces+esandahl=cdnpay -dot- ca -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of
> Chris Morton
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 12:30 PM
> To: Peter Neilson
> Cc: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?
>
> After further review of the Social Media Sonar site, I have nothing but
> disdain for its author. Whatever value his books may provide is quickly
> offset by his inability to use correct grammar and spelling. His is a clear
> example of self-publishing gone awry.
>
> > Chris
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com>
> wrote:
>
> > Good point... thanks for the elucidation. ;<)
> >
> > > Chris
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Peter Neilson
> > <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:40:56 -0400, Chris Morton
> >> <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> used "ego's" as the plural form of ego.
> >>>
> >>
> >> What? All plural's have apostrophe's! The apostrophe warn's you that
> >> an "s" is about to appear.
> >>
> >
> >
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork,
> communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help | http://bit.ly/1lRPd2l
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as esandahl -at- cdnpay -dot- ca -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help | http://bit.ly/1lRPd2l

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Monique Semp
RE: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Peter Hirons
RE: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Cardimon, Craig
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Chris Morton
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Mark Giffin
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Chris Morton
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Mark Giffin
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Chris Morton
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Mark Giffin
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Julie Stickler
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Chris Morton
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Peter Neilson
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Chris Morton
Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Chris Morton
RE: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?: From: Elayne Sandahl

Previous by Author: Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?
Next by Author: Re: Can style trump grammar rules?
Previous by Thread: RE: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?
Next by Thread: Re: LinkedIn invitations - accept "unpersonalized" ones ?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads