Shotguns (was: I'm furious...)

Subject: Shotguns (was: I'm furious...)
From: "Peter Neilson" <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 08:33:18 -0500

On Sat, 10 Jan 2015 07:56:11 -0500, Daniel Friedman <daniel -dot- friedman42 -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:

I have to say, as someone who is relatively new to the industry (3 years in the same full time role), this thread has been extremely educational. Most importantly I've learned:
1. That you have to negotiate rates with the recruiter, not the client.
2. That the client pays the same rates no matter which candidate they hire (so if they hire someone who's too desperate to negotiate, the recruiter makes $$$).
3. Double submissions will get your resume binned.
4. Recruiting companies are just as sketchy as I imagined.

Has anyone ever had success using the "shotgun" recruiters who send out requests asking to place us into slots for which we are not qualified?

For instance, suppose your resume mentions that you once documented an API for C++ developers. Lo and behold, Clueless Recruitment, Ltd. wants to submit you for a C++ dev position requiring seven years of experience. They even include a personal-sounding letter that explains how impressed they are by your qualifications. Is there any reason not to put Clueless, Ltd on your spam list?
Doc-To-Help: The Quickest Way to Author and Publish Online Help, Policy & Procedure Guides, eBooks, and more using Microsoft Word |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Interactive PDFs from Word -- best solution to a painful process?: From: ryan . minaker
RE: Interactive PDFs from Word -- best solution to a painful process?: From: Dan Goldstein
I'm furious...: From: Mike Starr
Re: I'm furious...: From: William Sherman
Re: I'm furious...: From: Mike Starr
Re: I'm furious...: From: Daniel Friedman

Previous by Author: Re: Economist magazine points to decline of tech writing
Next by Author: Re: Marketing and capitalization
Previous by Thread: Re: I'm furious...
Next by Thread: RE: Shotguns (was: I'm furious...)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads