RE: Quality assessment

Subject: RE: Quality assessment
From: Erika Yanovich <ERIKA_y -at- rad -dot- com>
To: Dan Goldstein <DGoldstein -at- nuot -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L (techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com)" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:53:43 +0000

No standards, a comparison with other companies in the industry should be enough.

-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+erika_y=rad -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+erika_y=rad -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of Dan Goldstein
Sent: 12 February, 2015 16:56
To: TECHWR-L (techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com)
Subject: RE: Quality assessment

Is there a specific ISO or other standard against which the docs should be audited? An industry-specific standard can be helpful in this regard. Otherwise, a consultant is likely to bring their own "best practice" (ha!) criteria.
Doc-To-Help: The Quickest Way to Author and Publish Online Help, Policy & Procedure Guides, eBooks, and more using Microsoft Word |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Quality assessment: From: Erika Yanovich
RE: Quality assessment: From: Dan Goldstein

Previous by Author: Recall: Quality asessments
Next by Author: Hottest trends in tech writing
Previous by Thread: RE: Quality assessment
Next by Thread: RE: Quality assessment

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads