[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Acrobat Standard shared review problems w/Reader reviewers

Subject: Acrobat Standard shared review problems w/Reader reviewers
From: "Monique Semp" <monique -dot- semp -at- earthlink -dot- net>
To: "TechWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 20:10:18 -0700

Both would indicate that Standard can be used for the shared reviews.
*HOWEVER* (at least for Acrobat 9), if you use Standard to create the
reviews, all reviewers must also have Standard (or better). If you want
reviewers to be able to use the *free Acrobat Reader*, you must use Pro to
prepare the reviews.

The Adobe forums are filled with people repeatedly discovering this and
having a devil of a time dealing with it. There's an argument to be made
that the Standard has a bug -or- that Adobe's comparison matrix is just
plain wrong/incomplete/misleading. There actually is an awful work-around if
you do use Standard to create the shared reviews: add some specific
JavaScript code directly into the PDF object--not pretty.

Of course, after giving up and clicking Send, I finally found the link that I wanted to include, which provides the JavaScript code to add: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1195903.

So I've given this message a new subject so it can more easily be found in the techwr-l archives.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) | http://bit.ly/1FR7zNW

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives

References:
Acrobat Pro versus Acrobat Standard?: From: Jim
Re: Acrobat Pro versus Acrobat Standard?: From: Kathleen MacDowell
Re: Acrobat Pro versus Acrobat Standard?: From: Monique Semp

Previous by Author: Re: Acrobat Pro versus Acrobat Standard?
Next by Author: Can't Install mif2go
Previous by Thread: Re: Acrobat Pro versus Acrobat Standard?
Next by Thread: Documenting .Net APIs

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads