TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Optimal line length for sales documents in pdf
Subject:Re: Optimal line length for sales documents in pdf From:Sean Brierley <sean -dot- brierley -at- gerberscientific -dot- com> To:"TechWhirl (techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com)" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:58:08 -0400
Hi,
Why were you told the width of your eyes was a good length? Is there
research to support that?
When I began, I was told "four inches" was a good line width. Being a
horsey kind of guy, that's always stuck with me, but I can't support it
with research.
Anyway, ignoring multiple column requirements and that pesky
print-versus-online thing, here's what a quick search on the Web found:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Di <dicorrie -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> I have a new manager with a sales background.
>
> He was writing a document.
>
> I saw that he had taken our standard template for long documents, and
> removed the indent on the body text. So the document had virtually no left
> or right margins and the length of line was almost the entire width of an
> A4 page.
>
> I protested. Seven years I have been telling the staff why it is important
> to leave the indent in and keep the length of a line to about the width of
> a person's eyes.
>
> He explained. That's because you write documents that people need to read.
> This is a sales document. Sales documents are judged on the number of
> pages.
>
> I could not think of a suitable answer.
>
> I know that in responding to an rfp it is very important that the sales
> team use the formats that have been given. But this was not one of those,
> and his argument was a new one on me.
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com