RE: Developments in the review cycle

Subject: RE: Developments in the review cycle
From: Erika Yanovich <ERIKA_y -at- rad -dot- com>
To: Ed <glassnet -at- gmail -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 06:25:40 +0000

âSW on the sideâ like in dressing on the side (for salads) - quite funny actually! Our HW products are telecom boxes with embedded SW. But with all this virtualization trend going on, I guess boxes will gradually be replaced by networking SW run on regular servers and then we can apply Markâs theory.

From: Ed [mailto:glassnet -at- gmail -dot- com]
Sent: 11 April, 2016 03:01
To: Erika Yanovich
Cc: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: Developments in the review cycle


Erika,
This is also true in my world. I have worked with projects that are equal split of hw and sw. Now the products are exclusively hw. Is your product a system or a smaller manufactured device with software on the side?

I agree it is challenging when you try to work through pubs with shorter schedules.
On Apr 10, 2016 02:56, "Erika Yanovich" <ERIKA_y -at- rad -dot- com<mailto:ERIKA_y -at- rad -dot- com>> wrote:
In my real world, there are also HW products, so there is no help inside the product. The documentation comes separately. Also, our target audience may not have Internet access where the equipment is located or in the NOC (due to security reasons).
Erika

-----Original Message-----

In the real world, there's still a lot of installed software with embedded online help. Once that ships and a customer installs it, the help doesn't get updated until they choose to install a later release.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as glassnet -at- gmail -dot- com<mailto:glassnet -at- gmail -dot- com>.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com<mailto:techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com<mailto:admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com>. Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
Developments in the review cycle: From: Erika Yanovich
RE: Developments in the review cycle: From: mbaker
RE: Developments in the review cycle: From: Steve Hudson
RE: Developments in the review cycle: From: mbaker
Re: Developments in the review cycle: From: Robert Lauriston
RE: Developments in the review cycle: From: Erika Yanovich
RE: Developments in the review cycle: From: Ed

Previous by Author: RE: Developments in the review cycle
Next by Author: RE: Developments in the review cycle
Previous by Thread: RE: Developments in the review cycle
Next by Thread: Re: Developments in the review cycle


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads