Re: Developments in the review cycle

Subject: Re: Developments in the review cycle
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:59:51 -0700

The line between proprietary hardware and "regular servers" is kind of
blurry. Some companies manufacture proprietary cards and put them in a
commodity PC server.

A couple of previous employers sold software as "appliances,"
pre-installed on commodity PC servers. This greatly reduced the amount
of time time developers had to spend coding for variations in
operating systems and device drivers.

On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Erika Yanovich <ERIKA_y -at- rad -dot- com> wrote:
> âSW on the sideâ like in dressing on the side (for salads) - quite funny actually! Our HW products are telecom boxes with embedded SW. But with all this virtualization trend going on, I guess boxes will gradually be replaced by networking SW run on regular servers and then we can apply Markâs theory.
>
> From: Ed [mailto:glassnet -at- gmail -dot- com]
> Sent: 11 April, 2016 03:01
> To: Erika Yanovich
> Cc: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: RE: Developments in the review cycle
>
>
> Erika,
> This is also true in my world. I have worked with projects that are equal split of hw and sw. Now the products are exclusively hw. Is your product a system or a smaller manufactured device with software on the side?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Developments in the review cycle: From: Erika Yanovich
RE: Developments in the review cycle: From: mbaker
RE: Developments in the review cycle: From: Steve Hudson
RE: Developments in the review cycle: From: mbaker
Re: Developments in the review cycle: From: Robert Lauriston
RE: Developments in the review cycle: From: Erika Yanovich
RE: Developments in the review cycle: From: Ed
RE: Developments in the review cycle: From: Erika Yanovich

Previous by Author: Re: Working Off Site
Next by Author: Re: Developments in the review cycle
Previous by Thread: RE: Developments in the review cycle
Next by Thread: Re: Developments in the review cycle


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads