Re: Developments in the review cycle

Subject: Re: Developments in the review cycle
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:30:55 -0700

I'm never finished in the sense that there's always work in progress.

The final doc for each release is a snapshot of the topics in
Confluence's database with draft content excluded. If I have to ship
before I'm really done documenting the release, I release an update as
soon as possible, typically two or three weeks later.

Technical details aside, this is the same method I used for years with
FrameMaker.

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Keith Hood <bus -dot- write -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> It depends on how you define "finished". To ship with the product, the
> documentation has to be clear, concise, well organized, easy to use, and
> complete *as far as adequately covering the most important and most likely
> uses of the product*.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Developments in the review cycle: From: Erika Yanovich
RE: Developments in the review cycle: From: mbaker
RE: Developments in the review cycle: From: Steve Hudson
RE: Developments in the review cycle: From: mbaker
Re: Developments in the review cycle: From: Keith Hood

Previous by Author: Re: Developments in the review cycle
Next by Author: Re: Alternatives to MadCap Flare
Previous by Thread: Re: Developments in the review cycle
Next by Thread: RE: Developments in the review cycle


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads