TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: "Overpriced" software From:Kelly Hoffman <kelly -at- NASHUA -dot- HP -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 17 Nov 1993 14:41:42 EST
Stefan Fielding-Isaacs <sfi -at- VERITY -dot- COM> writes:
> The last time I looked in a catalog the list price of FrameMaker
> for the Mac (my chosen platform of late) ran $795. True, one can
> get it for less.
Have you checked the *list* price of QuarkXpress or PageMaker lately?
I think you'll find those prices are also in the ballpark of $795.
> But this is a very, very high price for a product that has been
> so poorly marketed.
So if it were marketed better, that would justify a high price?
Some of us prefer to pay for features...
> I have a number of service bureaus I deal with in the City whom I just
> convincing to buy FrameMaker. Their reluctance stems from the fact that
> it is just starting to make inroads in the DTP market.
Hm, things must be different on the left coast; I haven't noticed
any problem finding service bureaus that can handle FrameMaker.
In fact, I haven't dealt with a service bureau that didn't already
have FrameMaker. Maybe I'm just lucky.
(By the way, "City" and "Valley" have different connotations in
different areas. I checked your area code to verify your location.
You might remember that this list reaches a large, dispersed audience...)
> Frame Technology is pricing their product up around the price of
> Illustrator, or PageMaker.
Yes, Illustrator and PageMaker are fine products. They serve
different needs than FrameMaker, although there's obviously some
overlap. I use FrameMaker for most of my work because it offers
capabilities that the others lack, and I need those features.
> These are well established products used by designers every day.
I wasn't aware that what "designers" use "daily" should determine
the price of a product. I'm also sure that FrameMaker is used every
day (by me, at least, but I'm probably not a "designer" in the sense
that Stefan is using the term :-).
> They give a lot of bang for the buck and deserve a premium price.
and FrameMaker doesn't "give a lot of bang for the buck"? Why do
you use it, then?
I have no connection to Frame Technology other than as a satisfied
user of their products. (I also have no connection to Aldus, Adobe,
or Quark, except as a user of their products.)
Kelly K. Hoffman kelly -at- nashua -dot- hp -dot- com
Learning Products Engineer
Hewlett-Packard, Network Test Division "Reading the manual is
One Tara Blvd., Nashua, NH 03062 admitting defeat."