TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Steve Fouts, in his musical, magical way, shared with us:
>I was perusing some want ads this weekend, and noticed one from a large
>and influential company looking for a Technical Writer. I was scanning
>the ad and saying to myself, "O.k., I can do that, yup, uh-huh, sounds
>The oops was when I hit, "typing, 60 wpm desired." This, to me, says in
>big red letters, "WARNING! This company has absolutely no respect for the
>profession of technical writing!" And I resumed scanning. Am I offbase?
While looking last summer, one company listed a typing requirement in their
want ad. My eyebrow arched. A sweat shop? A company that uses its writers
to "pretty up" or edit/enter material others have written? Eh, what the heck,
I'll fire off my resume. If they want to talk, I guess I can give them an
afternoon of my life.
They called. I interviewed. The writing staff was fairly inexperienced,
save the manager, and they wanted someone with some good experience to
broaden the department's abilities. I would have been creating new manuals
from scratch, and would have been a big part of planning a documentation
strategy change -- far more than the pseudowriting I feared.
Unfortunately, those in the food chain above that poor manager didn't think
much of writers, because they wouldn't allow her to offer anything near what
I wanted. She called, and said, "I want to hire you. But the company is
only giving me enough money to hire at the entry level again. So I won't
insult you with the offer they told me to make."
Thing is, the lowball offers were the rule in my search, *especially* from
companies which placed want ads which seemed to say, "Send Jim Grey up for
the job." (So I stayed put. Why uproot your life to go back to entry level
in the same career?) So, while a typing requirement does send up a red
warning flag, I don't discount such companies completely. You never know.
>Do you out there have any other huge red flags that you see in want ads.
>The only other one that I dislike is a request for salary history, since
>it implies price shopping, but I ignore that one.
My big red flag: contract. I wouldn't mind if I went to work for a company
which contracted writers to other companies, but I'm not the least bit
interested in contracting as an individual. I'd change careers first.
In my last search, when a company asks for salary history, I provided it.
What the heck. But the money I make in Terre Haute, Indiana is misleading,
since it costs next to nothing to live here. (My 2 bedroom apartment in a
good neighborhood is $250 per month. This is a good deal here, but isn't
far off the beam.) So, I always added a "Salary Requirements" paragraph
which read something like, "Salary must at least maintain my current standard
of living, depending upon local cost of living and offered benefits." This
is why I laughed so hard when a company in Chicago seemed so excited about
hiring me, but turned around and offered *exactly* what I make here. Ack!
Rent in Chicago ain't no $250.
jim grey |beebeebumbleandthestingersmottthehoopleraycharlessingers
jwg -at- acd4 -dot- acd -dot- com |lonniemackandtwangandeddiehere'smyringwe'regoingsteadyta
GO/M d p+ c++(-) l u+ e- m*@ s+/ n+ h f++ g- w+@ t+ r- y+(*)
Terre Haute, IN -- The Silicon Cornfield