TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Flame about citation From:Richard Mateosian <srm -at- C2 -dot- ORG> Date:Sat, 28 Jan 1995 09:42:38 -0800
> The courtesy of acknowledging the author and adding reference (Re:) to
> the subject, even quotes, I thought was considered acceptable conduct
> on this list?
Acceptable, yes. Desirable? not always.
If you are responding to what someone said, it makes sense to include a bit
of it to orient your reader. If they are interested in the topic they will
probably remember the posting you're responding to.
If the subject simply triggered you to say something not closely related,
then what's the point of a quote? If the original subject line is no longer
relevant, why include it?
As for citing the name of the author, I think that often introduces an
extraneous emotional element, especially if your contribution could be
construed (even remotely) as a criticism of the original posting. Why not
just state the point you're responding to and add your response? More
emphasis on the ideas and less on the personalities. ...RM
Richard Mateosian Technical Writer in Berkeley CA srm -at- c2 -dot- org