TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Info Mapping From:Jay Cherniak <CHERNJC1_at_TEAPOST -at- TEOMAIL -dot- JHUAPL -dot- EDU> Date:Tue, 21 Feb 1995 09:50:12 EST
Re: information mapping
Information mapping was big with my former employer in California. They sent
everybody in the editorial department, and there were 50 of us, to a two-day
class in the subject. I find that where I work now, in Maryland, hardly anybody
has heard of it. I have not used information mapping much, not because I don't
like it but because of the nature of the work I do, which is editing research
papers. Information mapping is intended more for manuals.
I have been impressed with the examples of its use that I have seen. When
done well, it transforms a dull, crowded technical document into an easy to read
display of information. The reader can easily find the parts that are important.
chernjc1 -at- jhuapl -dot- edu
Subject: Info Mapping
From: RSMH -at- aol -dot- com at .APL.and.BEYOND.
Date: 2/18/95 10:41 AM
I would love to here other's opinion on this subject. I'm sure we can have a
lively discussion. I for one have worked with Informaition Mapping and refer
to it has USA Today Documentation. I find myself so caught up in the formula,
I have a hard time actually writing. It seems to me that the creators want to
make a scientific process out writing, and writing, in my humble opinion, is
not a science per se.