TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Usability: Cross-refs From:Jim Brown <jimb -at- ATINY -dot- NY -dot- APERTUS -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 2 May 1995 11:40:02 EDT
We're trying to determine what format our cross-references should take:
are there any usability studies? With FrameMaker, we have almost limitless
possibilities - references to pages, section heads, sections numbers,
chapters, tables, figures, etc. all take the same amount of work.
In the past, referencing specific pages was avoided; I suspect the reason was
the overhead involved with what was largely a manual process. Does anyone
have other reasons? What would readers prefer? Please send your opinions
and/or references to any literature on the subject.
jimb -at- ssiny -dot- ssiny -dot- com
jimb -at- atiny -dot- ny -dot- apertus -dot- com
(My e-mail system is being "cut-over within the next quarter
to improve reliability." I can't wait.)