Concidences in Webster's 3rd

Subject: Concidences in Webster's 3rd
From: Scott Goodhue <goodhue -at- SMTPGATE -dot- DISCLOSURE -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 1995 16:45:34 EST

Golly, all this fracas over incidents/incidences...Webster's 3rd
Edition is considered America's OED, #1 in 'Merican academics. Well
here's the proof from the pudding:

Look at page 1142 for the definition of incidence. There you will
find incidence/[pronunciation]/N [in italics] -s.

That "-s" at the end indicates that to make incidence plural, ad an
"s".

How do I know that -s is what I say it is? Refer to the explanation
15A under inflectional forms, section 4.4 and 4.5:

"...a noun that has only a regular English plural formed by adding the
suffix -s or the suffix -es or by changing the final -y to -i- and
adding the suffix -es is indicated by an -s or -es following the label
N [italics]...[examples] bird...N -s, love...N -s...."

"...all standard English nouns can have regular English plurals...such
endings are give analogically in this dictionary to nouns that may
little be used in the plural...All that there presence means in cases
of doubtful frequency is that these plurals are available for use if
needed..."

You'll find that most nouns in the English language are made plural by
adding an -s or -es. Naturally, there are exceptions such as those
that end in "f," "ff," or "fe."

Oh, by the way, "remember his past negligences" is used in the
definition of negligence!


Previous by Author: Incidental Comment
Next by Author: What Webster's 3rd States About Incidences
Previous by Thread: Students, Teachers, and Language Skills
Next by Thread: Updated Bibliography


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads