Re: Restricting Access to TECHWR-L

Subject: Re: Restricting Access to TECHWR-L
From: Worthington <debral -at- FALCON -dot- CC -dot- UKANS -dot- EDU>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 10:35:51 -0500

Ditto that...!

Jack Worthington
Intellex Systems
1909 W 3rd Terr
Lawrence, KS 66044


On Tue, 19 Sep 1995, David Fisher wrote:

> <snip>
> I'm looking for opinions on this. It will probably fix an irritating
> problem, but will potentially cause different ones. If you have an
> issue to discuss about this, please post to the list. If it's just a
> simply Restrict/Do not restrict opinion, please send to me off-line.

> BTW, interestingly, I found the anon postings about list-relevant topics
> more objectionable than the spam. Spam I delete, but the other ones
> really bother me.
> <snip>

> My preference is to leave the list open. I have been on the list for several
> months now and have only seen a few (comparatively) posts that would be
> by the change that were particularly annoying.(spams for example) Having an
> open list has allowed several people to join the group (how do I subscribe?)
> and gives those with multiple service providers to send from their various
> locations.

> If a message is annoying, I have a delete key. The bandwidth they take up is
> minor compared to the total volume of the list. Finally, restricting the list
> just somehow feels wrong.

> My $0.02.

> David Fisher
> dfisher2 -at- ti -dot- com

Previous by Author: Re: telecommuting -- social costs ?
Next by Author: Re: Anon and other list restrictions
Previous by Thread: Re: Restricting Access to TECHWR-L
Next by Thread: Re: Restricting Access to TECHWR-L

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads