TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: TW-L Dissension From:Win Day <winday -at- IDIRECT -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 14 Nov 1995 07:00:27 -0500
At 06:05 PM 11/13/95 EST, Christy Dawn Langley wrote:
>Someone (can't remember who) reiterated a point that I have heard
>before on this list and it disturbs me. The point was that some
>subscribers for this list actually have to pay $$$ for the privilege and
>do not contend that certain threads, namely the recent thread of
>profanity, belong on this list.
>I can empathize to some extent with this contention. When I began to
>shell out $$$ for HBO, I did not like every single movie shown. And when
>my subscription magazine arrives in the mail, it's guaranteed I won't
>read every single article although I pay $$$ for the WHOLE magazine. I
>occasionally ask myself, "Am I getting my money's worth?" And sometimes
>the answer is no, but I have no plans to cancel either subscription
>namely because I get what I am promised -- movies and relevant articles
>-- for the most part.
Christy, it's not the same. You pay money for a cable movie channel for the
ability to watch what you choose, when you choose. If you choose not to
watch at all, you still pay for the ability.
When I pay for my connect time, I pay for each message I download because I
pay by the hour. If all the threads are on topic, I've gotten my money's
worth. If threads go on endlessly offtopic, then I've wasted online time
downloading them when I could have been doing something else online.
Deleting them only saves me my offline reading time, not my online
All the same, I still belong to this list, because the gems that fall
between the garbage are well worth the money I waste on the garbage.
Email: winday -at- idirect -dot- com