TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>> That said, I would never consider using Word or WordPerfect to publish a
>> hundred-page, fully illustrated and indexed manual. That would be like
>> trying to drive a nail with a pair of pliers: sure, you can do it, but who
>> needs the aggro?
>Oh don't say that, I have layouted several books with over 500 pages
>(all fully indexed and with many illustrations) using Word for Windows 6.0
>and it is the easiest to use while giving you the most automatisms.
Sure, you can do anything in Word. But why? Word is nice for small
things, but the ease of use it gives is offset by the problems it has
in reproducing exacting margins and object placement. Table
manipulation is another area where Word lacks the sophistication
offered by a purpose-built DTP program. Just for example, try to add a
table within a table. Word also lacks the ability to straddle ("merge
cells" in Word) cells within a column.
Word is great for many smaller projects, but for DTP it is sadly
lacking in the refinements that the average DTP program has as
standard equipment. Multiple master pages, strong table formatting,
versatile list generation (fonts used, cites, authors, etc.) are
examples. You can generate lists in Word, but the effort it requries
For my money (and time, which I _can't_ replace) FrameMaker is the
tool for the job.