TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: FrameMaker Petition From:"Susan W. Gallagher" <sgallagher -at- EXPERSOFT -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 13 Feb 1996 18:07:35 -0800
>Karen Gwynn writes:
>I think we should consider those on this list who do not use FrameMaker and
>who, I gather from other postings, would rather not hear about that product
>(whether it is good or bad comments).
>--------------------end of quote------------------------
And David Ibbetson answers:
>Although I use PageMaker (or should that be Pagemaker) and have no
>short-term plans to change to anything else I'm interested in the
>alternatives, especially what they can and can't do. For example, once or
>twice a year I swear about PageMaker's inability to handle footnotes.
I too would be interested in what some of the *other* dtp packages
do. We're always stuck in the Frame vs Word war. Whatabout "youse
guys" who use Ventura, Pagemaker, etc??? If I knew what the other
packages do/don't do, I'd be better armed with info when somebody
asks me what's good.
sgallagher -at- expersoft -dot- com