TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
First, thanks to everyone who responded to my query about tech writer =
backgrounds; without fail your replies have been friendly and quite =
informative. This list has good atmosphere and I look forward to it.
From at least a couple dozen good accounts of your experiences and =
education, it appears that adaptability ("pluck" as Bill Sullivan put =
it--very nice) as a writer, rather than specific technical background, =
gets the nudge.
Which surprises me somewhat, considering what many of the technical =
writer job postings ask for, not to mention my own experiences working =
with SMEs who have turned Writer (more often bad than good, though not a =
But as Bonni Graham said, "People writing the ads are very seldom =
connected to reality as we know it." Of course.
Which brings me to a larger question, really--the dichotomy of a =
technical writer--a dilemma of the division, if you will, between art =
and science. It's particularly interesting to me; I'm degreed in =
English and Mathematics and this all reminds me of college and the =
proverbial "writers" who hated science & math vs. the "engineers" who =
couldn't write (and didn't figure most liberal arts students had it in =
them to keep up). It doesn't stop with students, of course: how many =
liberal arts folks do you know that still resist computers, and how many =
technicians or programmers have you known that can't communicate worth a =
plug-nickel, verbally or in writing?
I've never been sold on the right-brain/left-brain theory--it's about as =
normative as formal English grammar, and it begs to pre-destine us into =
neat little niches, to deposit us into one category or the other . =
Kinda fits with the western corporate business model as well =
This is what's intriguing about technical writing--it bridges a gap and =
knocks down a couple nasty, smelly walls in the process. Perhaps this =
is why I, and others, are drawn to it (in the larger scheme of things). =
In its own way, it forces a resolution of the dichotomy, but not an end. =
Maybe the most important thing is not whether you win or lose the war, =
but how many battles you get to fight in.
Okay, enough syrupy egoromp. Thanks again for all the input--you've =
further shaped my perspective and given me a little =
understanding-ammunition as I continue to solicit freelance work. I'll =
try to shut up for awhile and do some more lurking.