TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Grammar Checkers? From:"Katherine D. Fisher" <kdfisher -at- IX -dot- NETCOM -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 11 Sep 1996 08:15:01 -0700
David Somers wrote:
> > Dare I suggest hire a human editor... IME software grammer checkers
> > aren't worth the (usually large) disk space they occupy.
> My response:
> 1. There is a built-in grammar checker in MS Word for many (but not
> all) languages, incl. English. More languages are available.
> Not everybody uses MS Word... I'm currently using FrameMaker and the rest of
> the people around me are using AmiPro.
> 2. The spell checker Grammatik, which comes with WordPerfect, is
> available as a stand-alone grammar checker, too.
> Does it work with FrameMaker files too?
> 3. To my experience - and I use grammar checkers for Danish (my
> mothers tongue) and English - it is NOT a question of either .. or.
> Like spell checkers, they raise questions on potential problems
> and errors, which a proofreader often overlooks, but on the other
> hand, a good proofreader will certainly find errors, which the
> grammar checker never finds. At least (~80+%) of a grammar
> checkers alarms are false alarms, but I love it for the errors it
> But constant clicking of 'Ignore' to get through those 80% false
> alarms is darn annoying (and time consuming), and sometimes you
> can hit 'ignore' by mistake and avoid a genuine mistake.
> Greetings from France,
> David Somers
> david -dot- somers -at- st -dot- com
> (Usual disclaimer - speaking for myself and not ST)
> Searchable archives located at http://www.documentation.com/
> ALL questions or problems concerning the list
> should go to the listowner, Eric Ray at ejray -at- ionet -dot- net -dot-
Let's put it this way: those who feel they need grammar checkers should
not be technical writers.
Searchable archives located at http://www.documentation.com/
ALL questions or problems concerning the list
should go to the listowner, Eric Ray at ejray -at- ionet -dot- net -dot-