Interleaf vs. FrameMaker

Subject: Interleaf vs. FrameMaker
From: Alexander Von_obert <avobert -at- TWH -dot- MSN -dot- SUB -dot- ORG>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 22:34:01 +0100

Hello Nikki,


* Antwort auf eine Nachricht von Nikki Blomquist an All am 30.10.96

NB> From: Nikki Blomquist <nikkib -at- WATER -dot- CA -dot- GOV>

NB> During this project, we will be
NB> phasing in PCs and phasing out our UNIX workstations. Because
NB> of the
NB> cost of maintaining Interleaf, we are considering switching to
NB> FrameMaker because it sounds like the best alternative to
NB> Interleaf.

Why should you switch from Interleaf? Framemaker does not come cheap and you
would have to learn a completely new software system.

I have used Interleaf 5.4.1 for DOS for quite some time. Shurely, it is its own
world. But unless you cannot do with it what you need to do, why should you
change? Interleaf on PC hardware is cheaper than the UNIX versions and you
could continue to use all your old documents.


Greetings from Germany,
Alexander

--
Alexander von Obert, Urbanstr. 2, 90480 Nuernberg, Germany
Free-lance Technical Writer (electronics, software)
Voice +49-911-403903, Fax +49-911-403904, BBS +49-911-403905 (FIDO 2:2490/1719)


Previous by Author: Readability tools & studies
Next by Author: German Mailing Lists
Previous by Thread: I need a title
Next by Thread: Intractable SME's


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads