TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: what to call it? From:Mitch Berg <mberg -at- IS -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 6 Jan 1997 09:39:08 -0600
John Engler wrote:
> What do y'all call your documentation--guides, user's guides, manuals,
> books, other?
This might be funny - I can stand fingernails screeching on chalkboards
all day, but I've had a lifelong aversion to any word with the root
"Document". This goes back to long before I became a techcomm -
Document, Documentation, Documents - they all make skin crawl. Worst of
all is the use of the term "Document Specialist" or, worst, "Documentor"
to describe my position. I guess I'm in the wrong field... ;]
Seriously, I avoid the term "document" like the plague, partly because
of the reason above, and partly because it's too generic. I use:
* "Guide" for anything that primarily explains procedures or instructs
in any way
* "Reference" for books that are primarily - well, references.
> And does the size (tiny or huge) or the purpose (end user
> or administration) of the doc matter in what you would call it?
Subject matter is the key - is it instructional, reference, what?
> Do users
If I could get my company to budget the study, I'd do it...
> We're just trying to decide what to call our stuff, and we'd just
> like some feedback from all of you.
* Eschew "Document"
* Ditto any word rooted in "Document"
* Strangle any management that uses any of the above.
Of course, that's just my opinion - I could be too emotionally involved
in the topic... ;]