Re: Functionalities vs Functionality

Subject: Re: Functionalities vs Functionality
From: "Williams, Diane (contractor)" <Williams_Diane -at- DOTE -dot- OSD -dot- MIL>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:31:01 -0500

>>I really hate that word, "functionalities."<<

Me too. Use "functions" instead.

Diane Williams
Walcoff & Associates, Inc.
Technical Editor/Writer
OSD, DOT&E
DWilliams -at- dote -dot- osd -dot- mil

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Smash the Apostrophistry! (was Re: Blasted Apostrophes (WasYears v. Years'))
Next by Author: Contracting contact
Previous by Thread: Functionalities vs Functionality
Next by Thread: Re: Functionalities vs Functionality


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads