TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Functionalities vs Functionality From:"Marlene J. Geary" <marlene -at- NECA -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:41:36 -0500
>I would like to get another opinion on the word "functionalities."
>Can (or should) I do a Replace All in my docs, changing "functionalities"
>I really hate that word, "functionalities."
If I had to use the word "functionality"...that's what I'd use.
However, I would probably use "features" and "services" rather than
functionality or functionalities.
| Marlene J. Geary | How do you distract 2500 | Writer/Editor |
| "Mars" | Technical Writers? | DISC |
| marlene -at- neca -dot- com | Give them a resume... | Farmington, CT |
I freely and proudly claim no guarantee that this message is error-free.