Re: Functionalities vs Functionality

Subject: Re: Functionalities vs Functionality
From: "Marlene J. Geary" <marlene -at- NECA -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:41:36 -0500

>I would like to get another opinion on the word "functionalities."
>
>Can (or should) I do a Replace All in my docs, changing "functionalities"
>to "functionality"?
>
>I really hate that word, "functionalities."
>

If I had to use the word "functionality"...that's what I'd use.

However, I would probably use "features" and "services" rather than
functionality or functionalities.


=====================================================================
| Marlene J. Geary | How do you distract 2500 | Writer/Editor |
| "Mars" | Technical Writers? | DISC |
| marlene -at- neca -dot- com | Give them a resume... | Farmington, CT |
=====================================================================
I freely and proudly claim no guarantee that this message is error-free.

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Sincere apologies
Next by Author: Re: Children
Previous by Thread: Re: Functionalities vs Functionality
Next by Thread: Re: Functionalities vs Functionality


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads