Re: Functionalities vs Functionality

Subject: Re: Functionalities vs Functionality
From: Ana Maria Gallo <anitamari -at- EARTHLINK -dot- NET>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:00:46 -0800

Matthew Danda <matt -at- SONYTEL -dot- BE> wrote
> I would like to get another opinion on the word "functionalities."
>
> Can (or should) I do a Replace All in my docs, changing "functionalities"
> to "functionality"?
>
> I really hate that word, "functionalities."
As Saglieri might have said: it has too many syllables. And I agree. Why
use functionality or functionalities when function is all that is
needed?

Ana Maria Gallo
anitamari -at- earthlink -dot- net

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Microsoft Word Dictionary
Next by Author: Re: "Space, the Final Frontier!"
Previous by Thread: Re: Functionalities vs Functionality
Next by Thread: Re: Functionalities vs Functionality


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads