Re: Technical adj. stack question

Subject: Re: Technical adj. stack question
From: "Kristine J. Olberg" <kjolberg -at- IX -dot- NETCOM -dot- COM>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 1997 19:19:42 -0600

----------
> From: Sella Rush <SellaR -at- APPTECHSYS -dot- COM>
>
> Objects are stored in a multi-tiered, dynamically hashed, persistent
> storage susbsystem.
>
> Objects are stored in a persistent subsystem that is structured in
> multiple tiers and uses dynamic hashing to provide fast scalable access
> to data.

I understood the first sentence perfectly. My opinion is that, in this
specific case, if the reader is capable of understanding the second
version, they will understand the first. Therefore, the rewrite has added
no value.

I have coached technical editors on this point many times: Don't rewrite a
sentence for the sake of rewriting. However, if you can add value by
rewriting, do it. Otherwise you're wasting time.

Regards...Kris
----------------------------------
kris -at- olberg -dot- com
kolberg -at- actamed -dot- com

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: PC Processing Power (was Home Alone)
Next by Author: Job Opportunity - Westchester County, NY
Previous by Thread: Technical adj. stack question
Next by Thread: Re: Technical adj. stack question


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads