Re: RFC1983 (Was E-mail or e-mail)

Subject: Re: RFC1983 (Was E-mail or e-mail)
From: "Parks, Beverly" <ParksB -at- EMH1 -dot- HQISEC -dot- ARMY -dot- MIL>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 09:24:58 -0700

I tried to resist this thread, but can't. I think Ella and RFC 1983 are
(the most) correct.

While e-mail is still widely used, the convention is steadily leaning
toward email. I use email; used to use e-mail; *always* hated E-mail and
any other variation (such as eMail).

I don't understand the resistance to omitting the hyphen. Do those who
insist on the hyphen also write inter-net and mo-dem?

Bev Parks
parksb -at- emh1 -dot- hqisec -dot- army -dot- mil

>

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: What the heck do you call it when...
Next by Author: Re: (Fwd) Re: RFC1983 (Was E-mail or e-mail)
Previous by Thread: RFC1983 (Was E-mail or e-mail)
Next by Thread: Re: RFC1983 (Was E-mail or e-mail)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads