Re: Latin vs. Germanic

Subject: Re: Latin vs. Germanic
From: Barry Batorsky <bbatorsky -at- ADMIN -dot- NJ -dot- DEVRY -dot- EDU>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 22:51:24 -0400

At 04:12 PM 8/2/97 -0400, Bruce Byfield rejoined:
>Barry Batorsky wrote:
>>Well, it's not that Germanic is gutteral, it's a longer, older >story, I
think. More like what [the original posting] said: "when someone wants >to
sound 'schooled' they use Latin words such as 'manual.' By >contrast, a
person trying to speak more commonly would choose >book.'"
>I think George Orwell's suggestion, "Never use a long word where a short
>one will do" is more to the point, especially if you emphasize the last
>six words. At times, the Germanic - or the shorter word - simply won't

Please, I don't think I would ever argue length. It is, as the poster I
quoted (sorry I have forgotten who it was) wrote, a question of which word
was/is "common" and which strange to the reader, listener.
Of course, "strangeness" draws attention to itself, and that sometimes is a
recommendation: "W- tastes good like a cigarette should."

And so, as always, there is no way around making judgements, and nothing to
do by learn from our errors.

Barry Batorsky

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Re: Latin vs. Germanic
Next by Author: Re: Linear vs. Nonlinear
Previous by Thread: Re: Latin vs. Germanic
Next by Thread: Re: Latin vs. Germanic

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads