Re: Topics, Posting guidelines and relevance

Subject: Re: Topics, Posting guidelines and relevance
From: "Michael A. Lewis" <lewism -at- BRANDLE -dot- COM -dot- AU>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 09:13:47 +1000

Iain Harrison wrote:
>
> This list has a cople of thousand members, so Eric is quite correct in
> working to keep discussions tightly focussed on issues directly
> related to technical writing-specific topics.

Thanks for this, Iain -- I stick to my view that language, as the most
fundamental tool we use, has as much place here as Frame or Word, but I
accept Eric's right to define the limits, so I will add the techcomm
list to my mail round.
--
Michael Lewis
Brandle Pty Limited
PO Box 1249
Strawberry Hills, NSW 2012
Australia


Posts: mailto:techwr-l -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu
Commands: mailto:listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g. SIGNOFF TECHWR-L)
Archives: http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html,
http://www.documentation.com/, or http://www.dejanews.com/
Subjects: JOB:, QUESTION:, SUMMARY:, ANNOUNCE:, or none of these.


Previous by Author: Re: ADMIN: Posting Rules Reminder
Next by Author: Re: Word to on-line or Frame to on-line
Previous by Thread: Topics, Posting guidelines and relevance
Next by Thread: !Press realease: WinHelp indexing tool released


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads