TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Word to Frame From:"Marie C. Paretti" <mparetti -at- RRINC -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 30 Oct 1997 12:30:55 -0500
At 10:26 AM 10/30/97 -0500, you wrote:
>To: Anyone who has converted from Word to FrameMaker
>How was the experience? What was good? What was bad? Do you use Acrobat?
>How's that going?
I took a 100+ page, 7-chapter manual (with no graphics -- I knew I was
getting FrameMaker so I waited) from Word 97 to Word 95 to FrameMaker.
Though tedious, the process was fairly painless. I set up identical
templates on all platforms (i.e. same paragraph tag names), and avoided
autonumbering or bulleting anything in Word (the FrameMaker paragraphs had
autonumbering and bullet symbols where appropriate). I ran a couple of
macros to strip out the autonumbering and bullet symbols in Word and change
some style names to fit my Frame template, and away I went.
There was some cleanup to do in Frame -- change the first step of every
procedure from Steps to Step1, for instance, but overall it wasn't as bad
as I'd imagined. Then again, mine was a small job.