Re: Re[2]: possessives [Ref:C674416]

Subject: Re: Re[2]: possessives [Ref:C674416]
From: "John A. Newman" <johnn -at- OTG -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 10:34:00 -0500

I think what we must have here is a difference in definitions. Generally
speaking, a couple of centuries would be 200 years. That's a far cry from
500 to 900 years (12th to 15th centuries). However, I can understand the
confusion. Someone near and dear to me views a couple as anything from
about 2 to 10, whereas I (being much more of an annoying stickler) see a
couple as 2, a few as 3 to 5, and several as about 6 to 12.

Ah, isn't communication fun when it's fraught with such insidious perils?
;-)

Happy Holidays and Merry Christmas (no matter how you spend Dec. 25th).

John Newman
OTG Software
johnn -at- otgsoftware -dot- com


-----Original Message-----
From: Geoff.King [SMTP:Geoff -dot- King -at- NA -dot- NWMARKETS -dot- COM]
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 1997 3:02 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: Re[2]: possessives [Ref:C674416]

----------------------------------------------------
But Michael, what you have written doesn't make sense. If you are
refering to Chaucer (or Middle English) you are perforce referring to a
"couple of centuries ago." (The 12th to 15th centuries. Give or take.)
I must be missing something in this thread.
geoff -dot- king -at- na -dot- nwmarkets -dot- com

http://www.documentation.com/, or http://www.dejanews.com/



Previous by Author: Re: grammar book
Next by Author: Re: possessives [Ref:C674416]
Previous by Thread: Re[2]: possessives [Ref:C674416]
Next by Thread: Re: possessives [Ref:C674416]


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads