TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Employment Interview From:Chris Hamilton <chamilton -at- GR -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 18 Feb 1998 07:58:21 -0600
Andrew Plato wrote:
> Moreover, you do not want to work for any company that DOES consider long
> terms of employment a good thing.
With all due respect, how do you know?
> Sheesh, 10 years at one company can be a BAD thing! To some companies,
> terms of employment that long can indicate that some will not adjust well to
> a new environment or new technologies.
That would be a mistake. I've been in my current job for almost two years and I
can see myself being here for another eight. What we're working on is cutting
edge. I'm learning _tons_ of new technical things and the work forces me to be
stronger at managing myself and my work every day (or drown).
The history of the company I work for is that it keeps itself on the cutting
edge with new products, as the technology evolves. Financially, I can't
complain, either. And it could get better as we progress. Why would I leave?
If, in eight years, I walk out with the experience I suspect I'll have and you
don't consider me because I've been someplace ten years, you probably lose. I
think you've made a pretty sweeping generalization.You might do better to look
at a person's qualifications rather than reject them out of hand because that
person's been in the same company for a decade.
chamilton -at- gr -dot- com
My views, not my employer's.