TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Don't Get Mad at me for this From:"Porrello, Leonard" <leonard -dot- porrello -at- COMPAQ -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 11 Sep 1998 16:25:50 -0700
I read the subject line, and if I am not interested, I delete. It takes me
about two seconds. And although you are most likely right regarding the
purpose of this list, as I see it, my two seconds of suffering might save a
fellow professional hours of misery. I don't mind two seconds of torment.
Furthermore, if one frames a utilitarian argument based on the idea of
cumulative list suffering (2 seconds * 4000 users), 2 hours and 22 minutes
of cumulative suffering is still probably less than the suffering of the
poor SOB who is so desperate for a technical solution that he sends a
message to this list. So, to maximize utility by minimizing suffering,
technical posts should be permitted. Of course, if we take a deontological
line, there are no two ways about it; you are right: no technically related
postings allowed. This bottom line boils down to this question (Ouch! Please
forgive the nasty mixed metaphore!): what type of ethical system does the
Compaq, Telecom Network Solutions
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Maxey
> Again, I do not want to offend, but there has to be a better way to find
> out the answers to these types of questions. Personally, I do not think
> this list is one of those places. Am I wrong about this?