TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: PDF v paper From:Tracy Boyington <tracy_boyington -at- OKVOTECH -dot- ORG> Date:Wed, 16 Dec 1998 14:36:22 -0600
> On-line documentation is a far superior format. No one can argue that
> full-colour graphics, audible instructions and animated screen-shots aren't
> superior to a black and white text.
Er... I *can* argue that reading online gives me a headache if I don't
wear my glasses, but reading print does not. I can argue that I can look
at a book without losing part of my application's window. I can argue
that if the procedure I need takes more than 3 or 4 sentences to
explain, I can see it on one page of a book without clicking through
several help screens. Online documentation is a wonderful thing, and it
does many things better than printed docs (and I prefer a combination of
the two), but to claim it is a "far superior format" in every case is to
ignore factors that may matter very much to your audience... you know,
those people you're writing for.