Re: ADMIN: Subject prefixes still recommended?

Subject: Re: ADMIN: Subject prefixes still recommended?
From: CASSIN Gilles <GCassin -at- MEGA -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 14:39:46 +0100

Bonanza. That's a good thread beginning. Note that RE: would destroy
anny's attempt to filter this.
THR: for thread is a good prefix too.
GCFL: >>>> Cassin flaming >>> AAAAArgh got caught>>
It's a good idea.
L'enfer est pavé de bonnes intentions. (French proverb)
Yuuups. This (winhelp- techwr is just for crowding those that are not
crossyposting) is not a heavy list (just take a look at
TECWurtheringamountsodthreadiflaminottuspacesafteraperiodthing. Though I
still love that list -chirp chirp Eric-. I don't read all the stuff in
my morning paper, I don't buy the same one my granda does - he's 95 and
loves to announce you the dollar/franc/DM rate - he's French, but he
lived for some time in NY state, around the 20's - and that he saw that
there were several cars burglared in Douarnenez (that's in Brittany, the
head that seems to say "Nananère" to America - no way with Dix Shonnary
- I miss years of kindergarten in my "peek a boo" vocabulary).
Well, "To work" Alice GOODMAN - Nixon in China.

Don't off me for that OT ????? non smirfsmurfsnipped message, please
(typing while kneeling is a good exercise).
A nice useful linx is packed with the thing:
http://worldserver2.oleane.com/Alain/oulipo.htm
yuck. Itzinavoreinlangwidj

-----Message d'origine-----
De: David Liske [mailto:delmar -at- TC3NET -dot- COM]
Date: mercredi 5 mai 1999 12:28
À: WINHLP-L -at- ADMIN -dot- HUMBERC -dot- ON -dot- CA
Objet: Re: ADMIN: Subject prefixes still recommended?


BS could stand for a couple of things -- jest or Blue-Sky/Robo. OT
would
likely include jest, and BS would be included under a Robo prefix.

David
Microsoft HTML Help MVP

================================
David's HTMLHelp Center is at
http://www.vbexplorer.com/htlphelp.asp
================================

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Windows Help Compiler (WINHELP) Discussion List
> [mailto:WINHLP-L -at- ADMIN -dot- HUMBERC -dot- ON -dot- CA]On Behalf Of Michael
> Mueller-Hillebrand
> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 4:53 AM
> To: WINHLP-L -at- ADMIN -dot- HUMBERC -dot- ON -dot- CA
> Subject: Re: ADMIN: Subject prefixes still recommended?
>
>
> HH = HTML Help
> WH = WinHelp
> WebH = WebHelp
> HTML = HTML
> WORD = word-based threads
> FM = Framemaker-based threads
> G = General inquiry
> OT = Off-topic
> JOB = job announcement
> NJ = need a job
> CARR = carreer advice
> BS = jest
> ANN = announcement
> TOOL = tool-related questions
> WWP = WebWorks Publisher questions
>
> how's that for a start?
>
> Bill Swallow
> Technical Writer
> B
> Billing Concepts
> Albany NY
> phone: (518) 433-7698
> mailto:wswallow -at- commsoft -dot- net
> http://www.billingconcepts.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Mueller-Hillebrand [SMTP:mmh -at- T3MEDIEN -dot- DE]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 1999 10:17 AM
> > Subject: ADMIN: Subject prefixes still recommended?
> >
> > I remember deep down in my brain that there have been conventions on
> > using
> > certain prefixes to messages. It helps a lot when browsing the
topics...
> >
> > I use HH: for HTML Help related questions.
> >
> > Can someone help me with other conventions? We might need new
> definitions
> > for
> > things like JavaHelp, Cross-platform HTML-based help, RoboHelp,
> RoboHTML,
> > and
> > and and...
> >
> > - Michael
> >
> >
> > Michael Mueller-Hillebrand
> >
> > t3 medien gmbh E-Mail mmh -at- t3medien -dot- de
> > Innovating HighTech Communication
> > Naegelsbachstr. 26 Fon: +49-9131-7448-12
> > D-91052 Erlangen, Germany Fax: +49-9131-7448-10
>
>


From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000


Previous by Author: Re: A couple of miscellaneous questions about online help
Next by Author: Re: MS Word 97-98 problems
Previous by Thread: Re: Didya Ever Wonder?
Next by Thread: Changing trademarks (was UNIX vs. Unix)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads