Re: Interview from hell

Subject: Re: Interview from hell
From: Stephanie Holland <SLHOLLAND -at- MICRONPC -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 09:23:33 -0600

William J. Wolfe wrote:

"I think many hiring decisions are made based on "gut
feel" and intangible qualities which are hard to

Then Rich Braden wrote:

"A agree, and therein lies the frustration. Candidates are not selected on
measureable, pertinent skills and experience. They are selected on whims -
another element of our highly dysfunctional corporate invironments."

It's true that some companies do a poor job of hiring. However, hiring
people based on a "gut feel" isn't necessarily bad, and it can't always be
equated with hiring "on whims," as Rich Braden said.

I equate the phrase "gut feel" with "best fit." So, in this case, "gut feel"
is a good thing. When I hire people, of course I select them based on
"measurable, pertinent skills and experience" as Rich said.

However, my gut feel also is important because it tells me whether the
person will fit within my writing group. If I don't think the person will
fit, that doesn't mean the person is not qualified for the job. It just
means that the person most likely wouldn't work well within my group.

Examples of qualities that don't fit in my group are inflexibility, the
inability to give and receive constructive criticism, lack of assertiveness,
and thinking you have nothing else to learn about writing.

As William wrote above, it is difficult to explain these things in hiring
decisions because they're based on a gut feel. But that doesn't mean they
don't play an important part in hiring. Someone who is eager to learn HTML
and has a great attitude carries more weight with me than someone who
already knows HTML but thinks he has nothing else to learn.

This is a bit unrelated, but I really want to mention it. The number of
cover letters, resumes, and writing samples I receive with errors outweighs
the number I get that are clean and concise. Someone who tells me he is an
excellent writer and editor and is terrific with details but then leaves
words out of sentences and accidentally writes "on" when he should have
typed "an" doesn't stand much of a chance with me. Unfortunately, the job
candidate probably doesn't realize this is the reason he was rejected.

Stephanie Holland
Technical Communication Manager
Information Technology Department
Micron Electronics (Nampa, Idaho)
mailto:slholland -at- micronpc -dot- com

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=

Previous by Author: Re: Interview Etiquette
Next by Author: Re: Dropdown menu on a button
Previous by Thread: Re: Interview from hell
Next by Thread: Re: Interview from hell

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads