[techwr-l] FrameMaker Numbering Question

Subject: [techwr-l] FrameMaker Numbering Question
From: Mark Dempsey <mxd2 -at- osi -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L, a list for all technical communication issues" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 10:06:11 -0700

Hi,

(cross-posting to FrameUsers too...)

I recently updated our FrameMaker templates. This includes autonumbered
chapters with the following numbering formatting in the auto-number
settings:

N:Chapter <n+>< =0 >< =0 >:\t

And a similar format for Appendix:

A:Appendix <A+>< =0 >< =0 >:\t

Since moving these the new template settings, however, I've had
numbering problems in both chapter *and* appendix para tags.

With continuous paragraph numbering I get a book (consisting of chap1,
chap2, AppendixA, AppendixB) numbered chap1, chap3, AppendixC,
AppendixD.

I've got this result even when I make a blank, new file with only one
para tag (chapter or appendix). I've also miffed and remade every
constituent file.

Any further suggestions?

--
Regards,

-- mailto:Mark -dot- Dempsey -at- osi -dot- com
--
-- Mark Dempsey
-- Technical Publications
-- Objective Systems Integrators
-- 110 Woodmere, Folsom, CA 95630
-- 916.353.2400 x 4777

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Sponsored by Weisner Associates Inc., Online Information Services
As a leading service provider to technical writers, we are proud to sponsor
TECHWR-L. Visit us at http://www.weisner.com or mailto:info -at- weisner -dot- com -dot-

Sponsored by ForeignExchange (http://www.fxtrans.com)
Rely on ForeignExchange for responsive and professional
software localization and technical translation services.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-6452R -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com




From


Previous by Author: Re: Who dreams up these things? (long)
Next by Author: [techwr-l] Frame Numbering Solved (duh!)
Previous by Thread: [techwr-l] documentation usage
Next by Thread: [techwr-l] Re: documentation usage


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads