RE: Numbering Steps for Multiple Paths

Subject: RE: Numbering Steps for Multiple Paths
From: "Austin, Nancy" <naustin -at- trane -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:00:41 -0500

> I still don't buy it. The number "1." for a step is a multipurpose
> identifier that clarifies there is only one step

I weigh in on the side of a bullet or other mark rather than a number.
Remember elementary school when we first learned to outline? 'Never put a 1
without a 2, never put an "A" without a "B".' Even if we understand what we
mean, our audience may not.

Thank You,
Nancy Austin
email: naustin -at- trane -dot- com <mailto:naustin -at- trane -dot- com>








Previous by Author: RE: Do Online Books Increase Offline Sales?
Next by Author: re: transitive verbs (was Do alarms always sound?)
Previous by Thread: Fw: Numbering Steps for Multiple Paths
Next by Thread: RE: Numbering Steps for Multiple Paths


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads