RE: Tech Comm Portfolio

Subject: RE: Tech Comm Portfolio
From: "Dan Roberts" <droberts63 -at- earthlink -dot- net>
To: "'Shelley Hoose'" <shoose -at- mail -dot- metro -dot- net>, "'TECHWR-L'" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 10:16:52 -0500

fwiw, "information designer" doesn't quite sit right - makes me feel like
I'm twiddling fonts and nudging kerns more than bashing out concepts,
procedures, and all that stuff.

This subject was discussed a little while ago. Most folks seemed to like to
stick with 'technical writer' although some wanted to go with 'information
developer'. Both are good - ya gotta get the words first, no matter which
format they finally get delivered in, so TW works. But a lot of what we
churn out is more than (oh dear, this could get me in trouble) just
technical - we write white papers, and policies and procedures, and god
knows what else - but it's information and we develop it from raw
materials - specs, sample code, interviews, beta applications, etc. And,
'writer' might conjure up too many associations with quill pens and
parchment. And 'technical communicator' is just too much of a mouthful for
me to get out easily - it just doesn't roll trippingly off the tongue <g>.

as for 'instructional designer ' - or developer - got me there. I think some
skills definately overlap, but they can be two completely different areas.

and speaking of fonts, anyone out there using that MS Comic Sans Serif? I
kinda like it, makes the doc look less stodgy and intimidating. But then
again, my typical response to finding bugs in the software i'm doc'ing is
"Broke, no good" (long story).

Dan Roberts
droberts63 -at- earthlink -dot- net

Delores Delago for President

> -----Original Message-----
> My generic resume says that I'm a "writer, editor, designer *
> print and
> web." My tech comm resume inserts the word technical before "writer."
> But is the word "design" appropriate for the tech field? I
> have not seen
> it often used. Or would "information design" be better?
> Actually now that I
> think about it, why don't technical communicators refer to
> themselves more
> often as information designers -- I think it is a more
> descriptive term.
> Does it sound too high-falutin? Not able to be understood by
> an average
> reader? Because "technical communicator" also does not tell
> the story.
> In any case, for those of us (and I gather it's most of us)
> designing our
> docs as well as writing them, is there a common descriptive term?
> And, another question: is an instructional designer a
> sub-category of an
> information designer?

Previous by Author: RE: labeling screen shots
Next by Author: Re: Retentive on Friday
Previous by Thread: Tech Comm Portfolio
Next by Thread: RE: Tech Comm Portfolio

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads