RE: to be versus ing

Subject: RE: to be versus ing
From: "Harry Bacheler" <hbacheler -at- geo -dot- census -dot- gov>
To: "Brierley, Sean" <Sean -at- Quodata -dot- Com>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 14:23:16 -0500

What about this?

Manual updating of software tables may be required.

Harry M. Bacheler, Jr.
Consultant
VGS, Inc.

"The thoughts, ideas, and opinions expressed in my portion of this email are
mine and mine alone. They are not the thoughts, ideas, and/or opinions of
any past, present, or future employers, or any group that I might belong
to."

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bounce-techwr-l-20951 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
> [mailto:bounce-techwr-l-20951 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com]On Behalf Of Brierley,
> Sean
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 December, 1999 12:00 PM
> To: TECHWR-L
> Subject: to be versus ing
>
>
> Okay guys, any preference and why:
>
> "Software tables may need to be manually updated."
>
> "Software tables that may need manual updating."
>
> Thanks for the thought.
>
> Sean
> sean -at- quodata -dot- com
>





Previous by Author: RE: What's Telecom?
Next by Author: RE: Word's TOC
Previous by Thread: RE: to be versus ing
Next by Thread: RE: to be versus ing


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads