RE: Quick Comparison of Ventura & Framemaker

Subject: RE: Quick Comparison of Ventura & Framemaker
From: "Brierley, Sean" <Sean -at- Quodata -dot- Com>
To: "'techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com'" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:49:48 -0400


Don't believe everything you read. Don't believe everybody's marketing
department either, including Corel and Adobe.

Best regards,

sean -at- quodata -dot- com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: priest -at- sfu -dot- ca [SMTP:priest -at- sfu -dot- ca]
> I'm appalled by the misinformation that's been published in this list. I
> hope the following corrects it. It is sourced from
> (which also compares
> Pagemaker and QExpress).
> I'm only listing where the products differ. I think you'll be surprised
> at
> how much more Ventura offers. I summarize what I think is most important,
> after the list:
> [recommend reading this using a monospace font!]
> Two-page spreads yes no
> Select ruler zero-point yes no
> Max. page size 1800x1800" 216x216"
Ah-ha, that explains why I could not create the 300-in by 300-in document
for print and publishing on the web as a PDF <vbg>, it's a limitation of
FrameMaker . . .. Sorry, couldn't resist.

Good luck with Ventura!!

sean -at- quodata -dot- com

Previous by Author: OT: FM + WWP SE (was RE: FrameMaker releases (was FrameMaker vs V entura) and PDF Mark)
Next by Author: RE: Quick Comparison of Ventura & Framemaker
Previous by Thread: Quick Comparison of Ventura & Framemaker
Next by Thread: RE: Quick Comparison of Ventura & Framemaker

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads