Re: Redundancy - Necessary?

Subject: Re: Redundancy - Necessary?
From: Jeff Hanvey <techwriter -at- jewahe -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 06:08:43 -0800 (PST)

Rewrite to avoid the redundancy:

>Woobbly Factor Widgets only. Displays the percentage of woobblies if the data is available.

>Woobbly Factor Widgets only. Displays the percentage of woobblies; appears only when the data is available.

Or something similar

_____________________________________________________________
Jeff Hanvey: http://www.jewahe.net

_____________________________________________________________
You deserve a better email address! Get personalized email @yourname
or @yourcompany from Everyone.net --> http://www.everyone.net?tag

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Now's a great time to buy RoboHelp! You'll get SnagIt screen capture
software and a $200 onsite training voucher FREE when you buy RoboHelp
Office or RoboHelp Enterprise. Hurry, this offer expires February 28, 2002. www.ehelp.com/techwr

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ and check it out.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: Use of Simplified or Controlled English
Next by Author: RE: deer in the headlights
Previous by Thread: Redundancy - Necessary?
Next by Thread: Re: Theory vs. Practice...


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads